Health inequalities: health conditions and interventions
COVID-19 has renewed attention on unfair and avoidable health differences across the population. But it remains unclear how the pandemic might inform public health policy.

COVID-19 has brought the drivers behind health inequality into sharp focus. But are there resources available to meet research and policy needs?
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58248/HS46
Health inequalities are defined by the NHS as unfair and avoidable differences in both physical and mental health across the population.1 Inequality is reflected not only by a person’s health, but their experience in accessing care and the quality of that care. Health inequalities arise from the conditions that people experience in their lives. Some drivers are environmental and tend to change slowly, so can impact over long periods and multiple generations. Policy-making may also disadvantage some groups in society over long periods of time. Inequalities can be mapped across interacting domains including geographies, socio-economic background, protected characteristics or being in a vulnerable group. There is an extensive research literature on health inequalities; a prominent report examining this in England was published in 2010,2 and updated in 2020.3 A key message is that there is a social gradient of health: “the higher a person’s social position the better their health is likely to be”.4 This, and other data from a variety of sources,5,6 demonstrate that there is a range of persistent health inequalities across the life course, some of which are widening. Examples include stalled improvements in life expectancy, longer periods of life spent in poor health and a growing gap in health outcomes between affluent and deprived areas. The COVID-19 pandemic has focused attention on the extent to which socio-economic status and other demographic characteristics are associated with poor health outcomes and differing provision of care across the UK population, including ethnicity.7,8 As inequalities are well-characterised, the focus is on what interventions are effective and how they can be used. Resources about effective interventions are available from organisations including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)9 and Public Health England,10,11,12 and are implemented by key actors, including public health bodies within local government and by healthcare settings. Critiques of government approaches to narrowing health inequalities have focused on a lack of the value placed on taking a long-term, whole systems approach; creating connected and cross-cutting policy, and learning from previous approaches to health inequalities. There are also criticisms about whether the NHS has given sufficient focus to reducing inequalities.13 The extent to which social determinants of inequality are addressed in current policy-making is a key message coming from the public health community. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought the drivers behind health inequality into sharp focus.14,15,16
Key challenges and opportunities include:
There is extensive research evidence that health inequalities have impacted society for years; the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has renewed focus and attention on this issue.
Experts have helped us identify 30 areas of change to help the UK Parliament prepare for the future.
Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash
COVID-19 has renewed attention on unfair and avoidable health differences across the population. But it remains unclear how the pandemic might inform public health policy.
COVID-19 has increased demand for research evidence. In response the research and publication processes have sped up. What does this mean for scrutiny?
Educational inequalities emerge in early childhood and effects continue throughout a person’s life. How might school closures and disruption widen inequalities?