Documents to download

Digital evidence may be present in almost every crime, offering new opportunities to support the police in their investigations. Evidence can come from smart phones, WIFI routers, CCTV, wearable devices such as fitness watches and other devices. Digital forensic analysis can be used to extract information from these data sources, helping to provide evidence of criminality, exonerate suspects or aid an investigation more generally.

The powers available to law enforcement and security agencies to intercept the content of communications, and to acquire information about communications from communications service providers, are governed by a number of pieces of legislation. These include the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 and the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014. Parliament is currently considering the Investigatory Powers Bill, which the Government intends to consolidate and update these powers.

Challenges for digital forensics investigators can include difficulties with accessing data, for instance if it encrypted or stored in the cloud, and the rapid pace of technological change. New hardware, operating systems and applications must be studied to discover how to reliably find information of forensic value, which requires the development and testing of new techniques. The proliferation of devices and the increasing amount of data being stored on them, is adding to digital forensic workloads. Some police forces have delays of up to 12 months for the analysis of devices, and policing organisations have identified a need to develop their digital investigation capabilities.

Approaches being taken to address the disparity between demand for services and available resources include triaging, for example determining which devices should be prioritised for further investigation, and Streamlined Forensic Reporting (SFR). SFR is currently being used to deliver DNA and fingerprint evidence to UK courts, to reduce the time and cost of gathering forensic evidence, and may also be appropriate for digital evidence.

Documents to download

Related posts

  • Devices with screens include game consoles, laptops and televisions. Screen use refers to activities undertaken on such devices and the time spent on them. Children’s screen use has increased over the past decade. Policy-makers and parents have expressed concerns about possible effects of screen use on children/young people’s development and health. This POSTnote provides an overview of how children/young people use screens, the opportunities and risks of this use, evidence on the possible effects on health and development, and evidence on ways to support healthy screen use.

  • The use of technology to perpetrate domestic abuse, referred to as tech abuse, has become increasingly common. Domestic abuse charity Refuge reported that in 2019, 72% of women accessing its services said that they had been subjected to technology-facilitated abuse. Common devices such as smartphones and tablets can be misused to stalk, harass, impersonate and threaten victims. Some groups have raised concerns that the growing use of internet-connected home devices (such as smart speakers) may provide perpetrators with a wider and more sophisticated range of tools to harm victims. How is technology being used to perpetrate domestic abuse, how can this be prevented and what role can technology play in supporting victims?

  • People’s behaviour has a major role in the success of test, trace and isolate programmes. Uncertainty about whether to report symptoms, low perceived risk of COVID-19 disease and concerns about the consequences of self-isolation are among the barriers to adherence. Has the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies looked at adherence to TTI? What evidence is there on people’s understanding and willingness to be tested, provide contact details and self-isolate? Is there anything that can be done to improve this?