Documents to download

Current approaches to product use are largely linear (make, use and dispose) resulting in valuable materials being wasted. A circular approach uses restoration and recovery processes to increase the lifespan of products, components and materials. This goes beyond current recycling, which has largely focused on ‘easy wins’ in waste streams, such as paper, as end-of-life circular products are designed to be an input for new industry. Circular systems incorporate a range of activities that reduce the demand for material inputs and recover/reuse materials already in the system.

However, as the cost of waste management is borne by stakeholders other than producers, there is little incentive to design for better product reuse and disassembly.

Key points in this POSTnote include:

  • In a circular economy, reusing products, components and materials keeps them at their most useful and valuable. As a result waste is minimised.
  • Moving to this model could create new economic and employment opportunities and provide environmental benefits through improved materials and energy use.
  • Changes to product design and ownership, as well as focusing on access to services, are key to enabling circular businesses.
  • Establishing a circular economy will require voluntary action, government intervention and international co-operation.
  • Strategies differ across the UK, as policy areas are spilt between government departments and devolved administrations.
  • Barriers to this economic transition have been identified, such as achieving economies of scale in recovery processes.

Acknowledgements

POSTnotes are based on literature reviews and interviews with a range of stakeholders and are externally peer reviewed. POST would like to thank interviewees and peer reviewers for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing, including:

  • Professor Dale Southerton, The University of Manchester
  • Dr Dominic Hogg, Eunomia*
  • Dr Aiduan Borrion, University College London
  • Dr Ben Croxford, University College London
  • Dr Nick Voulvoulis, Imperial College London*
  • Dr Teresa Domenech , University College London
  • Dustin Benton, Green Alliance*
  • Hannah Schellander, Defra*
  • Jane Stratford, Defra*
  • Jocelyn Blériot, Ellen MacArthur Foundation
  • John Waterworth, DAERA*
  • Jonny Hazell, Green Alliance
  • Dr Lee Davies, Defra*
  • Libby Forrest, Environmental Service Association*
  • Pat Jennings, CIWM
  • Patrick Mahon, WRAP*
  • Professor Martin Charter, University of the Creative Arts*
  • Professor Raimund Bleischwitz, University College London
  • Simon Johnson, Defra*
  • Sonika Sidhu, Local Government Association
  • Steve Lee, CIWM

*Denotes people who acted as external reviewers of the briefing.


Documents to download

Related posts

  • POST has published 20 COVID-19 Areas of Research Interest (ARIs) for the UK Parliament. ARIs were identified using the input of over 1,000 experts. They were then ranked in order of interest to UK Parliament research and select committee staff, following internal feedback. Each ARI comes with a series of questions aiming to further break down each broad area. The ARIs focus on the impacts of the global pandemic and range from economic recovery and growth, to surveillance and data collection, long-term mental health effects, education, vaccine development, and the NHS.

  • Machine learning (ML, a type of artificial intelligence) is increasingly being used to support decision making in a variety of applications including recruitment and clinical diagnoses. While ML has many advantages, there are concerns that in some cases it may not be possible to explain completely how its outputs have been produced. This POSTnote gives an overview of ML and its role in decision-making. It examines the challenges of understanding how a complex ML system has reached its output, and some of the technical approaches to making ML easier to interpret. It also gives a brief overview of some of the proposed tools for making ML systems more accountable.

  • Over 350 experts have shared with us what they think the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic will be in the next 2 to 5 years. This work was done to inform the House of Lords COVID-19 Committee inquiry on Life beyond COVID, and is based on 366 expert responses. Areas of concern include work and employment, health and social care, research and development, society and community, the natural environment, education, arts, culture and sport, infrastructure and crime and justice.