Documents to download

Water, energy and food (WEF) systems interact with each other and the environment. For instance, food crops require energy for fertilisers, water for irrigation, and rely on environmental processes for cycling of nutrients and pollinating crops. Agricultural practices have also led to declines in pollinators and an excess of nutrients in the environment. The term nexus has been used to describe these interactions since the 1980s. It has become prominent in discussions of international resource policies and is the focus of UK research programmes. Exact definitions of the water, energy and food nexus differ, but all seek to describe interactions across and between relevant systems. Understanding the interactions between WEF systems can help decision makers balance trade-offs made between them, in response to increasing demand. This in turn could increase security in these sectors.

Key points in this POSTnote include:

  • A nexus assessment seeks to describe the interactions of water, food, energy, environmental and social systems to identify the interdependencies and trade-offs between these systems.
  • Failure to take account of interactions and trade-offs creates vulnerabilities to shocks, such as extreme weather events, which can have cascading impacts across systems.
  • There are no set methods for undertaking nexus assessments, but key aspects involve understanding the interactions between systems and people.
  • Awareness of interactions and trade-offs is necessary, but addressing them also requires an understanding of the social, political and environmental context.

Acknowledgements

POSTnotes are based on literature reviews and interviews with a range of stakeholders and are externally peer reviewed. POST would like to thank interviewees and peer reviewers for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing, including:

  • Dr Ruth Welters, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia*
  • Professor Liz Varga, Professor of Complex Infrastructure Systems, Complex Systems Research Centre, School of Management, Cranfield University*
  • Dr Candice Howarth, CECAN, University of Surrey*
  • Dr Adam Cooper, STeAPP, UCL*
  • Dr Geoff Darch, Principal Consultant, Climate Futures, Vice-Chair, Futures Programme, ATKINS*
  • Professor Dan Osborn, Chair of Human Ecology, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London*
  • Dr Rachel Muckle, Defra
  • Dr Gary Kass, Defra/Natural England*
  • Greg Lowe, Executive Director, Capital, Science, and Policy Practice, Willis Towers Watson
  • Professor David Demeritt, Department of Geography, King’s College London*
  • Professor Tim Benton, UK Champion for Global Food Security and Professor of Population Ecology, University of Leeds*
  • Professor James Wilsdon, Professor of Research Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Sheffield*
  • Dr Hayley Leck, King’s Centre for Integrated Research on Risk and Resilience, Department of Geography, King’s College London*
  • Professor Alice Bows-Larkin, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester*
  • Dr Gemma Cranston, Senior Programme Manager, University of Cambridge Institute of Sustainability Leadership*
  • Ben Shaw, Director of Policy Studies Institute and Deputy Director of CECAN, University of Westminster*
  • Professor Declan Conway, Grantham Research Institute, LSE and University of East Anglia*

*Denotes people who acted as external reviewers of the briefing.  

 


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Evolving life sciences and agricultural research approaches may have a decreasing need to access physical resources in future, such as plant seeds or viral material. Information and genetic data may be all that is required for commercial exploitation of biological resources. This POSTnote summarises the challenge this creates for international discussions on the governance of genetic resources and the possible options for addressing these.

  • Plastic packaging waste has become a key consumer concern. In the UK, over 2.2 million tonnes of plastic packaging enter the consumer market each year. Much of this is used in the food sector because plastic packaging is cheap, light to transport, hygienic, and can be used to extend the product’s shelf-life. In the UK around 46% of plastic packaging is collected for recycling, mostly through local authority collections. However several issues with the current systems of plastics recycling persist. This POSTbrief reviews proposals to Defra and HM Treasury to improve plastics recycling in the UK .

  • The effect of consumers stockpiling certain goods and the slow reaction of retailers to ration them exposed the limitations of cost-efficient and streamlined supply chains to be agile and adapt to unforeseen shocks. This suggests that changes may be needed to make the supply chain more resilient. Specific problems arose from the closure of parts of the catering sector and the lack of agility in redistributing supplies from this sector to retail outlets or the food donation/charity sector. This was due to challenges in packaging availability, logistics and labelling requirements; leading to an increase in food loss. Agricultural food producers and the wider supply chain may have incurred significant losses from the impacts of COVID-19. Food processing facilities have been responsible for a number of localised COVID-19 outbreaks. This may be influenced by a range of factors, including the proximity of workers for prolonged periods, the need to speak loudly to communicate over the noise of the machines or the shared welfare spaces external to the factory setting. The immediate effects of COVID-19 on the food supply system are the current policy concern, but the longer-term food system issues highlighted as a result of the pandemic will have to be addressed by considering how to build resilience to possible future shocks.