Documents to download

The active removal of GHGs from the atmosphere, referred to as negative emissions, could be achieved using a variety of techniques. GGR techniques mainly focus on the removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, rather than other GHGs. The most promising GGR techniques include:

  • Enhancing natural land sinks (Box 1). Increasing tree cover and improving forest management, increasing the amount of carbon stored in soil and ocean sediments, and restoring peatlands have all been suggested as GGR approaches.
  • Transferring CO2 to geological storage (Box 2). CO2 can be taken from the atmosphere, directly or via plants, and pumped into underground storage in geological formations. Studies suggesting that CO2 stored in geological formations could be secure for 100,000 years. 

Key points in this POSTnote include:

  • It may be difficult to achieve net zero emissions in the second half of the century without Greenhouse Gas Removal (GGR) from the atmosphere.
  • If successfully developed, some unproven GGR techniques, such as Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), could be employed earlier to help meet carbon targets cost-effectively.
  • However, there is risk of relying on as yet unproven GGR techniques to meet future carbon targets. Uncertainties include their scalability, effects on land use, financial viability and social acceptability.
  • There is little policy on GGR. Future policies could support the development or deployment of GGRs or their integration into emissions accounting frameworks.


POSTnotes are based on literature reviews and interviews with a range of stakeholders and are externally peer reviewed. POST would like to thank interviewees and peer reviewers for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing, including:

  • Professor Kevin Anderson, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change, University of Manchester

  • Mike Childs, Friends of the Earth*

  • Almuth Ernsting, Biofuelwatch

  • Dr Clair Gough, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change, University of Manchester*

  • Alexandra Jenkins, DfT

  • Cathy Johnson, BEIS*

  • Beth O’Connell, BEIS*

  • John Lanchbery, RSPB

  • Lord Oxburgh, House of Lords*

  • Dr Glen Peters, Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research Oslo (CICERO)*

  • Professor Pete Smith, University of Aberdeen*

  • Dr Steve Smith, CCC*

  • Owain Tucker, Shell*

  • Matt Willey & Jens Wolf, Drax*

  • Dr Phil Williamson, NERC, University of East Anglia*

*Denotes people who acted as external reviewers of the briefing

Documents to download

Related posts

  • Evolving life sciences and agricultural research approaches may have a decreasing need to access physical resources in future, such as plant seeds or viral material. Information and genetic data may be all that is required for commercial exploitation of biological resources. This POSTnote summarises the challenge this creates for international discussions on the governance of genetic resources and the possible options for addressing these.

  • Plastic packaging waste has become a key consumer concern. In the UK, over 2.2 million tonnes of plastic packaging enter the consumer market each year. Much of this is used in the food sector because plastic packaging is cheap, light to transport, hygienic, and can be used to extend the product’s shelf-life. In the UK around 46% of plastic packaging is collected for recycling, mostly through local authority collections. However several issues with the current systems of plastics recycling persist. This POSTbrief reviews proposals to Defra and HM Treasury to improve plastics recycling in the UK .

  • There is increasing interest in using machine learning to automatically analyse remote sensing data and increase our understanding of complex environmental systems. While there are benefits from this approach, there are also some barriers to its use. This POSTnote examines the value of these approaches, and the technical and ethical challenges for wider implementation.