Documents to download

Key points 

  • Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) is a system of technologies. It combines biomass (plant matter or organic waste) for energy generation, with the capture and permanent storage of the resulting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. 
  • BECCS is one of the ‘negative emissions’ technologies projected to play a major role in global climate mitigation. It will be needed if the Paris Agreement goals are to be met. 
  • The scale of BECCS projected in some models has raised concerns around the sustainability of bioenergy and overall carbon footprint of BECCS required to deliver negative emissions. 
  • Its development requires robust and transparent policy and sustainability frameworks; with environmental, economic and social dimensions; as well as Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) infrastructures that do not yet exist. 

Evidence from global models of the climate, economy, energy and land use systems – Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) – suggest that some level of Greenhouse Gas Removal is needed to achieve this Paris Agreement goals to limit global warming to well below 2˚C.  

Estimates of the mitigation potential of BECCS within IAMs vary considerably. There are a number of potential challenges associated with the widespread use of BECCS, primarily around scale and land availability. Robust governance frameworks, which ensure transparency and sustainability, would be required. In addition, there are risks relying on the technology for future mitigation future when significant uncertainties currently exist around its cost and its potential to achieve negative emissions. 

Estimates by the Committee on Climate Change suggest that the UK mitigation potential of BECCS ranges from 20 to 51 MtCO2 (equivalent to 5-14% of UK CO2 emissions at 2018 levels). Suggested UK policy approaches to supporting BECCS’ development could include integrating BECCS into carbon markets such as the EU ETS, supporting pilot and demonstration schemes, and investing in CCS infrastructures. 

Acknowledgements

POSTnotes are based on literature reviews and interviews with a range of stakeholders, and are externally peer reviewed. POST would like to thank interviewees and peer reviewers for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing, including: 

  • Prof Patricia ThornleyAston University* 
  • Keith Whiriskey, Bellona Foundation 
  • Theo MitchellBellona Foundation 
  • Mark Preston AragonèsBellona Foundation* 
  • Chris GentCarbon Capture & Storage Association* 
  • Mike HemsleyCommittee for Climate Change* 
  • Prof Gideon HendersonDepartment for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs* 
  • Peter ColemanDepartment for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy* 
  • Sherry SiobhanDepartment for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy* 
  • Stephen FordenDepartment for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy* 
  • Luke JonesDepartment for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy* 
  • Nicholas DohertyDepartment for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy 
  • Richard GowDrax* 
  • Dr Jo HowesE4tech* 
  • Dr Mike NortonEuropean Academies’ Science Advisory Council* 
  • Kelsey Perlman, Fern* 
  • Prof Paul FennellImperial College London 
  • Dr Niall MacDowellImperial College London 
  • Prof James SkeaImperial College London 
  • Dr Sara BudinisInternational Energy Agency* 
  • Dr Jonathan Scurlock, National Farmers’ Union
  • Dr Mary BoothPartnership for Policy Integrity* 
  • Samuel StevensonRenewable Energy Association* 
  • Michelle MortonShell* 
  • Joanna ColemanShell 
  • Prof Pete SmithUniversity of Aberdeen* 
  • Dr Jo HouseUniversity of Bristol 
  • Dr David ReinerUniversity of Cambridge* 
  • Dr Mathilde FarjardyUniversity of Cambridge* 
  • Dr Andrew WelfleUniversity of Manchester* 
  • Dr Robert BellamyUniversity of Manchester* 
  • Dr Clair GoughUniversity of Manchester, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research* 
  • Dr Alison MohrUniversity of Nottingham 

(* indicates contributors who reviewed the note) 


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Evolving life sciences and agricultural research approaches may have a decreasing need to access physical resources in future, such as plant seeds or viral material. Information and genetic data may be all that is required for commercial exploitation of biological resources. This POSTnote summarises the challenge this creates for international discussions on the governance of genetic resources and the possible options for addressing these.

  • Plastic packaging waste has become a key consumer concern. In the UK, over 2.2 million tonnes of plastic packaging enter the consumer market each year. Much of this is used in the food sector because plastic packaging is cheap, light to transport, hygienic, and can be used to extend the product’s shelf-life. In the UK around 46% of plastic packaging is collected for recycling, mostly through local authority collections. However several issues with the current systems of plastics recycling persist. This POSTbrief reviews proposals to Defra and HM Treasury to improve plastics recycling in the UK .

  • The effect of consumers stockpiling certain goods and the slow reaction of retailers to ration them exposed the limitations of cost-efficient and streamlined supply chains to be agile and adapt to unforeseen shocks. This suggests that changes may be needed to make the supply chain more resilient. Specific problems arose from the closure of parts of the catering sector and the lack of agility in redistributing supplies from this sector to retail outlets or the food donation/charity sector. This was due to challenges in packaging availability, logistics and labelling requirements; leading to an increase in food loss. Agricultural food producers and the wider supply chain may have incurred significant losses from the impacts of COVID-19. Food processing facilities have been responsible for a number of localised COVID-19 outbreaks. This may be influenced by a range of factors, including the proximity of workers for prolonged periods, the need to speak loudly to communicate over the noise of the machines or the shared welfare spaces external to the factory setting. The immediate effects of COVID-19 on the food supply system are the current policy concern, but the longer-term food system issues highlighted as a result of the pandemic will have to be addressed by considering how to build resilience to possible future shocks.