The use of technology to perpetrate domestic abuse, referred to as tech abuse, has become increasingly common. Domestic abuse charity Refuge reported that in 2019, 72% of women accessing its services said that they had been subjected to technology-facilitated abuse. Common devices such as smartphones and tablets can be misused to stalk, harass, impersonate and threaten victims. Some groups have raised concerns that the growing use of internet-connected home devices (such as smart speakers) may provide perpetrators with a wider and more sophisticated range of tools to harm victims. How is technology being used to perpetrate domestic abuse, how can this be prevented and what role can technology play in supporting victims?
Documents to download
Edge computing (228 KB, PDF)
Edge computing describes the use of computing resources (including data storage and processing) located close to the devices which generate the data, rather than relaying this data to a remote cloud computer to perform computations. It is suited to applications that require quick computation and use large volumes of data, which would require high bandwidth for transfer to the cloud. It may also offer some privacy benefits as more data can be processed locally rather than being sent to a cloud. However, the distributed nature of edge computing, and the need for many individual devices to connect and interact, poses a number of unique challenges to its widespread adoption.
- Edge computing can enable fast data processing and reduces the need to transfer large amounts of data across the network, it can also enhance privacy and enable computation to continue if the network connection is lost.
- Edge computing is considered to be an emerging technology that has not yet reached maturity.
- For some applications, edge computing offers advantages over cloud computing or vice versa. However, for other applications a flexible approach that uses both cloud and edge is the most appropriate.
- Edge computing is expected to contribute to many emerging technologies including smart manufacturing, autonomous vehicles and the increased uptake of smart internet-connected devices.
- It may be challenging to coordinate data exchange and share computational tasks between many different devices on an edge computing network.
- New security technologies are being developed to secure edge computing networks that contain many devices without using too many computational resources.
- Although edge computing can offer privacy advantages, it may become increasingly difficult to determine who has the responsibility for complying with data protection law and whether they are equipped to comply as uptake by consumers becomes more widespread.
POSTnotes are based on literature reviews and interviews with a range of stakeholders and are externally peer reviewed. POST would like to thank interviewees and peer reviewers for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing, including:
- Dr Bill Mitchell OBE, BCS
- Professor Carsten Maple, Warwick Manufacturing Group*
- Professor Dimitra Simeonidou, University of Bristol
- Glen Robinson, Microsoft*
- James Lovegrove, Red Hat*
- Joanna Hodgson, Red Hat*
- Adrian Keward, Red Hat*
- Jonathan Legh-Smith, BT*
- Bryan Stiekes, Google Cloud*
- Ksenia Duxfield-Karyakina, Google Cloud*
- Martin Percival, Red Hat*
- Professor Lilian Edwards, Newcastle University
- Neil Stansfield, NPL
- Nicky Stewart, UKCloud*
- Paul Duncan, NPL*
- Paul Martynenko, POST Board*
- Professor Paul Watson, Newcastle University*
- Professor Reza Nejabati, University of Bristol*
- Rebecca Lucas, RUSI
- Rhiannon Lawson, Government Digital Service
- Richard Ward, IBM*
- Simon Hansford, UKCloud*
- Sneha Dawda, RUSI*
- Dr Stephen Pattison, ARM*
- Tom March, Government Digital Service*
*denotes people and organisations who acted as external reviewers of the briefing.
Documents to download
Edge computing (228 KB, PDF)
People’s behaviour has a major role in the success of test, trace and isolate programmes. Uncertainty about whether to report symptoms, low perceived risk of COVID-19 disease and concerns about the consequences of self-isolation are among the barriers to adherence. Has the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies looked at adherence to TTI? What evidence is there on people’s understanding and willingness to be tested, provide contact details and self-isolate? Is there anything that can be done to improve this?
Test, trace and isolate programmes across the UK are under pressure as COVID-19 cases rise in all age groups and demand for tests grows. Further pressure comes from people seeking tests because they have symptoms caused by other respiratory viruses but need a test in order to rule out COVID-19. The Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies has described the impact of current test and tracing on the transmission of the virus as “marginal”. How does test and trace work and what are the current challenges limiting its effectiveness in reducing COVID-19 cases?