Documents to download

This POSTnote outlines different ways in which hydrogen is produced, and how these could be made low carbon. It examines how much low-carbon hydrogen may be needed in future, and the challenges in increasing production. It discusses hydrogen storage and transportation, commercial and regulatory challenges, and the potential global market. It does not examine potential end-uses of hydrogen.

Key messages include:

  • Blue and green hydrogen production are the low-carbon approaches most often considered at large scale. The hydrogen molecules are the same in each case.
  • Blue hydrogen is produced from natural gas and is fitted with carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. It is closer to large-scale use, but still results in some greenhouse gas emissions. This is because CCS technology is not able to capture all CO2 from production, and natural gas extraction and transportation results in methane leaks.
  • Green hydrogen is produced by splitting water using renewable electricity. It is currently more expensive than blue hydrogen to produce, but is expected to become cheaper in the 2030s. The UK’s offshore wind potential could be used to produce it at scale.
  • Nuclear power or biomass could also be used to produce low-carbon hydrogen, but these approaches are less developed. The latter can help to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
  • Some stakeholders advocate using the existing gas network to transport hydrogen. Doing so would require upgrades to network infrastructure. It could also be transported by road, rail or ship.
  • If produced in large quantities, hydrogen would need to be stored. There are several ways to do this, but depleted oil and gas fields may have the greatest potential.
  • The UK and Scottish governments have targets to increase low-carbon hydrogen production. The UK Government is expected to publish a Hydrogen Strategy before autumn 2021. It funds several demonstration projects for low-carbon production. It will develop a business model for producing and selling low-carbon hydrogen in 2021.

Acknowledgements

POSTnotes are based on literature reviews and interviews with a range of stakeholders and are externally peer reviewed. POST would like to thank interviewees and peer reviewers for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing, including:

  • Ed Macfarlane, Abbott Risk Consulting
  • Mark Neller, Arup
  • BEIS Hydrogen Economy Team
  • BEIS Science & Innovation for Climate and Energy *
  • Mike Stephenson, British Geological Survey
  • Baroness Brown of Cambridge, Professor Dame Julia Brown, Climate Change Committee
  • Dr David Joffe, Climate Change Committee *
  • Chloé Nemo, Climate Change Committee *
  • Qamar Khan, CPH2 *
  • Graham Bennett, DNV *
  • Dr Janie Ling-Chin, Durham Energy Institute *
  • Prof Anthony Roskilly, Durham Energy Institute *
  • Dr Andrew Smallbone, Durham Energy Institute *
  • Ben Madden, Element Energy
  • Matthew Hindle, Energy Networks Association *
  • Kevin Kinsella, ERM *
  • Dr James Walker, European Marine Energy Centre *
  • Dr Richard Lowes, Exeter University
  • Prof Mercedes Maroto-Valer, Heriot-Watt University
  • Dr Stuart Hawksworth, HSE
  • Prof Paul Fennel, Imperial College
  • Dr Robert Sansom, Independent energy consultant
  • Tim Burnhope, JCB
  • Sam French, Johnson Matthey *
  • Philip Brain, Kiwa Gastec
  • Mark Crowther, Kiwa Gastec *
  • Anthony Green, National Grid *
  • Dave Robson, NEPIC
  • Russ Oxley, Northern Gas Networks
  • Prof Philip Ringrose, Norwegian University of Science and technology *
  • Michael Wagner, Ofgem *
  • Dr Jan Rosenow, Regulatory Assistance Project
  • Jash Rughani, Ryse Hydrogen
  • Prof Benjamin Sovacool Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU)
  • Nigel Holmes, Scottish Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association *
  • Andrew Goodwin, Scottish Power *
  • James Higgins, SGN *
  • Matthew Knight, Siemens Energy UK *
  • Mark Lewis, Tees Valley Combined Authority
  • Flo Bullough, The Geological Society
  • Dr Edris Joonaki, TÜV SÜD UK National Engineering Laboratory *
  • Oliver Broad, UCL Energy Institute *
  • Prof Paul Dodds, UCL Energy Institute *
  • Prof Vladimir Molkov, Ulster University
  • Dr Grant Wilson, University of Birmingham *
  • Professor David Cebon, University of Cambridge
  • Prof Stuart Haszeldine, University of Edinburgh
  • Dr Katriona Edlmann, University of Edinburgh *
  • Jonathan Scafidi, University of Edinburgh *
  • Dr Clair Gough, University of Manchester *
  • Prof Seamus Garvey, University of Nottingham *
  • Dr Marco Sacchi, University of Surrey *

* denotes people and organisations who acted as external reviewers of the briefing


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Invasive non-native species

    Research suggests that the threat from invasive non-native species (INNS) is growing. Biological invasions by INNS harm native species and habitats and can have economic impacts. Biosecurity measures can be adopted to prevent the introduction and spread of INNS. This POSTnote summarises the drivers and impacts of INNS and the measures needed to meet national and international environmental targets.

    Invasive non-native species
  • Green steel

    Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the iron and steel industry make up 14% of industrial emissions in the UK. Decarbonisation of the steel industry is needed if the UK is to meet its target of net zero GHG emissions by 2050. This POSTnote outlines current steelmaking processes in the UK, the technologies and measures that can be used to reduce CO2 emissions, and the supporting infrastructure and policies that could enable a ‘green steel’ industry in the UK.

    Green steel