Documents to download

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many arts and culture organisations used technology to avoid closing and to engage audiences remotely. According to the Economist Intelligence Unit, 25 million people in the UK engaged with arts and culture online in 2020. Turning to digital technologies did not however mitigate the impact of the pandemic on arts and culture, with small organisations and freelancers significantly affected. Although digital technologies have the potential to improve engagement with arts and culture, research from the pandemic showed how pre-existing disparities impact the ability of organisations and practitioners to use technology. Most stakeholders argue that the sector is at a crucial point where it can learn from the increased uptake of digital technology during the pandemic, which can contribute to Government priorities such as Levelling Up.   

Key points in this briefing 

  • Supporting digital innovation in the creative and cultural industries is a UK Government priority. Some arts and culture organisations however struggle to access funding for implementing digital technologies and for research and development (R&D).  
  • Digital technologies have the potential to positively impact audiences and improve accessibility. Evidence from the pandemic however shows that digital arts and culture engaged the same audiences as in-person activity. Disabled audiences benefited significantly from increased access online, but this has not yet translated to improving accessibility in person.  
  • Pre-existing inequalities in the cultural sector affect some creative practitioners’ ability to use technology. Stakeholders link some of these barriers to the wider lack of diversity in the creative sector.  
  • Size and location impact the ability of arts and culture organisations to use technology, with smaller organisations in deprived areas encountering significant barriers. There were some small organisations who innovated quickly during the pandemic but financial returns on digital activity remained low for most organisations.  
  • Many stakeholders argue there are opportunities for the sector to learn from the pandemic and develop its digital capability. They call for more funding for technological innovation in arts and culture, focusing on cross-sector collaboration and R&D. Other recommendations include bridging arts and culture and technology within formal education and improving diversity and accessibility in the sector.  
      

Acknowledgements 

POSTnotes are based on literature reviews and interviews with a range of stakeholders and are externally peer reviewed. POST would like to thank interviewees and peer reviewers for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing, including: 

Members of the POST Board* 

The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport* 

Professor Pascale Aebischer, University of Exeter, Pandemic and Beyond*

Dr Dan Ashton, University of Southampton 

Lucy Askew, Creation Theatre* 

The Audience Agency* 

Hasan Bakhshi MBE, Creative Industries Policy and Evidence Centre* 

Professor James Bennett, Royal Holloway University of London, StoryFutures* 

Dr Hayleigh Bosher, Brunel University* 

Rafe Clayton, University of Leeds* 

Design and Artists Copyright Society* 

Sarah Ellis, Royal Shakespeare Company* 

Dr Anita Greenhill, University of Manchester 

Professor David Hesmondhalgh, University of Leeds* 

Owen Hopkin, Arts Council England 

Dr Lise Jaillant, Loughborough University* 

Professor Helen Kennedy, University of Nottingham 

Dr Jenny Kidd, Cardiff University* 

Dr Dominic Lees, University of Reading 

Dr Jorge Lopes Ramos, Greenwich University 

Trevor MacFarlane FRSA, Culture Commons  

Dr Paul Meller, Arts and Humanities Research Council* 

Helen Meller, Arvon 

Dr Helen Miles, University of Aberystwyth 

Dr Richard Misek, University of Kent, Digital Access to Arts and Culture* 

Fiona Morris, The Space* 

Nell Nixon, Loughborough University 

Professor Mike Phillips, University of Plymouth 

Dr Mariachiara Restuccia, University of Sussex* 

Peter Rudge FRSA, Staffordshire University  

Francesca Sanderson, Nesta 

Professor Paul Sermon, University of Brighton, Telepresence Stage, Pandemic and Beyond

Dr Josh Siepel, University of Sussex 

Dr Jon Swords on behalf of XR Stories, University of York 

Sandra Tusin, NFT Soho* 

Pau Waelder

Professor Ben Walmsley, Centre for Cultural Value, University of Leeds*

Professor Simeon Yates, Liverpool University* 

Dr Efpraxia Zamani, University of Sheffield* 

*denotes people and organisations who acted as external reviewers of the briefing. 
 


Documents to download

Related posts

  • Energy consumption of ICT

    Information and Communication Technology (ICT), including data centres, communication networks and user devices, accounted for an estimated 4-6% of global electricity use in 2020. Increasing demand for ICT is expected to lead to an increase in global ICT energy use over the next decade. Experts have highlighted ongoing improvements in the energy efficiency of the technology. However, there is limited evidence on the energy use of ICT, and a significant degree of uncertainty in existing estimates. This POSTnote summarises estimates of the energy used across the ICT sector and trends that may affect it. It discusses developments in energy efficiency and issues related to energy reporting and standards.

    Energy consumption of ICT
  • Geothermal energy

    Geothermal energy is a source of low-carbon, homegrown, renewable energy. It is available throughout the UK and can provide heat or power all year long independent of weather conditions. It currently delivers less than 0.3% of the UK’s annual heat demand, using only a fraction of the estimated available geothermal heat resource. There is the potential to increase this proportion significantly, but this will require long-term government support to develop a route to market and overcome high upfront capital costs and geological development risks.

    Geothermal energy