Biodiversity loss and nature recovery
Meeting legally binding targets for reversing biodiversity loss would require a range of challenges to be addressed but would also provide societal benefits.
This POSTnote summarises environmental and economic concerns arising from fertiliser use and the mitigation opportunities via diversification and innovation.
The future of fertiliser use (821 KB , PDF)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58248/PN710
Fertilisers are composed of three main components in varying proportions: nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, along with other elements that are required in smaller quantities. Fertilisers currently maintain crop yields globally but pose risks to the environment. Artificial and organic fertilisers can have impacts on water quality through leaching; air quality through ammonia emissions; and climate change through nitrous oxide emissions.
Production of artificial fertiliser is predominately based on non-renewable resources. For instance, the production of nitrogen-based fertilisers use fossil fuels as both a feedstock and a source of energy for the reaction and phosphorus-based fertilisers are typically obtained from mining of non-renewable resources. Recent events and high energy prices have led to a global price surge in artificial fertilisers, with the price of artificial fertilisers increasing substantially for British farmers between 2021 and 2022.
Commentators agree a range of diversification and innovation of fertilisers could be used to address these concerns including: using renewable resources for artificial fertiliser production; reducing the environmental impact of fertilisers through pollution management; diversifying artificial fertiliser use with organic and bio fertilisers; improving soil health; and, the use of precision application technologies and nutrient planning to improve the efficiency of fertilisers usage.
Stakeholders state a lack of investment in diversification and innovation is a key challenge, as well as developing an effective evidence base of measures that is transferred to farmers and ensuring that policies implemented constitute a ‘just transition’ approach to reducing the environmental impacts of fertilisers.
POSTnotes are based on literature reviews and interviews with a range of stakeholders and are externally peer reviewed. POST would like to thank interviewees and peer reviewers for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing, including:
Members of the POST Board*
Will Brown, Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs*
Katy Orford, Comisiwn y Senedd, Senedd Commission*
Eleanor Reed, Natural England
Andrew Clark, National Farmers’ Union
Diane Mitchell, National Farmers’ Union*
Alastair Heinrich, National Farmers’ Union*
Ian Ludgate, National Farmers’ Union*
Philippa Arnold, National Farmers’ Union*
Anthony Hopkins, National Farmers’ Union*
Harry Langford, CHAP
Richard Glass, CHAP
Alexander McCormack, CHAP
Robert Shaw, N2 applied
Polina Lisitsina, N2 applied
Richard Tranter, University of Reading
Mark Sutton, Ecotoxicological researcher at UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Tony Miller, John Innes Centre
Megan Tresise, University of Leeds*
Lei Wang, British Geological Survey
Diane Purchase, Middlesex university
Jack Bobo, Food Systems Institute at the University of Nottingham *
Erick Bandala, Desert Research Institute
Sacha Mooney, Hounsfield Facility at the University of Nottingham
Rachel Gomes, University of Nottingham
Nasmille Larke-Mejia, Quadram Institute Bioscience*
Chris Dawson, Independent consultant for the British Survey of Fertiliser Practice
Giles Oldroyd, University of Cambridge
Vicki Hird, Sustain Alliance
Hannah Blitzer, Wildlife and countryside link*
Gareth Morgan, Soil Association
Ellie Roxburgh, Soil Association*
Clair Mike, Linking Environment And Farming
*denotes people who acted as external reviewers of the briefing
The future of fertiliser use (821 KB , PDF)
Meeting legally binding targets for reversing biodiversity loss would require a range of challenges to be addressed but would also provide societal benefits.
This POSTnote outlines the mandatory biodiversity net gain policy introduced in England in 2024 and the risks and challenges for delivering its objectives.
This POSTnote outlines the benefits and challenges of using enhanced rock weathering as a GGR approach for addressing emissions from UK hard-to-abate sectors.