Who decides how land is used? Collaboration in multifunctional land-use decisions
This POSTnote outlines how collaborative decision-making can support multifunctional land-use decisions to deliver locally legitimate outcomes in England.
This briefing discusses the challenge of increasing access to water and sanitation in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Access to Water and Sanitation (446KB PDF)

Almost a third of the global population (2.4 billion people) lack access to sanitation facilities. Over 660 million people lack access to clean water. One billion people still defecate in the open – a leading cause of diarrhoeal disease.
The UN defines access to safe water and sanitation facilities as basic human rights. Poor water and lack of sanitation have a wide range of negative impacts, for example:
Research evidence shows hygiene promotion to be one of the most cost-effective ways to improve public health. For these reasons, improving access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) has been a key aim of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to achieve universal access to safe water and sanitation by 2030.
There are challenges. More comprehensive data collection will be required to monitor progress towards these targets. Other challenges include engaging communities, financing, and more closely integrating the developmental and humanitarian agendas.
This briefing discusses the challenge of increasing access to water and sanitation in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology would like to thank the following interviewees for kindly giving up their time during the preparation of this briefing:
*Denotes interviewees who responded to a request to act as an external reviewer of the briefing
Access to Water and Sanitation (446KB PDF)
This POSTnote outlines how collaborative decision-making can support multifunctional land-use decisions to deliver locally legitimate outcomes in England.
What are QALYs and what role do QALYs play in deciding which treatments the NHS funds?
Children and young people use social media for a range of reasons. What does the evidence suggest about the potential benefits and risks of this usage, how strong is the evidence, and are there any evidence gaps?